On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:44:01PM +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > > Not much. I'm still quite uncomfortable on replacing MIT kerberos, the > > > reference > > > implementation of Kerberos and the default one on Debian, with another, > > > less > > > used and tested, alternative. > > > > Would it be possible to use MIT krb for the dynamic libcurl, and *no* > > krb for the static libcurl? The krb part is, after all, only used for > > SPNEGO, and the set intersection of "people who want static libcurl" > > and "people who need krb" is probably pretty small. > > I second that. A static library without krb is better than the current > one which is not usable at all.
That's just not true. Nothing stops you from using the static libcurl library
and linking to the shared krb5, which is installed on pretty much every Debian
system, being it priority standard.
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
