Alessandro Ghedini wrote: >> Would it be possible to use MIT krb for the dynamic libcurl, and >> *no* krb for the static libcurl? The krb part is, after all, only >> used for SPNEGO, and the set intersection of "people who want >> static libcurl" and "people who need krb" is probably pretty >> small. > > [...] Not to mention the fact that every libcurl flavour would need > to be re-built multiple times only for removing a dependency on the > static library.
Ah, OK, I thought you already had to build multiple times to get the dynamic and static versions in the first place. I guess that shows my ignorance of library packaging. If you're not already rebuilding, I agree that doing so just for this would not be worth it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
