On 2012-04-14 01:31, Norbert Preining wrote: > Yes, bug 607857 ... > >> But I also remember that I didn't remove and code around that, ehich means >> that *sonewhere* in the packages there is an unprotected >> mktexlsr >> run which does not specify trees, so the one in texmflocal is generated.
> And looking into the code I see the somewhere the definition of > TEXMFSYSVARDIR > has gone lost, and thus mktexlsr runs in unprotected mode. That bug is^H^Hwas in code that gets inserted into maintainer scripts by dh_installtex? I remember seeing several other tex packages leaving /u/l/s/texmf/ls-R (but I can't check now because texlive-base "is broken"). Are the following actions the correct way to solve these problems: * if the package uses dh_installtex it needs to be rebuild with a fixed tex-common (>= 3.8) * otherwise I'll file a serious bug "unprotected call to mktexlsr creates /u/l/s/texmf/ls-R - please use dh_installtex instead of manually created maintainer scripts" Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
