Hi all, On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:12:49 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 26 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> I guess the intention is that jmpost and jbibtex-bin simply go away? >> (They're also built from ptex-bin, but don't appear to have any reverse >> dependencies.) > > Kohda-san? I am not sure, I would say yes. Hmm, wait a bit more. If we fail to update texfam, it is no problem to remove jbibtex-bin but if we can update texfam jbibtex-bin is necessary. So this depends on the status of texfam. I think jbibtex-base (not -bin!) is replaced by texlive-lang-cjk /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bib /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bib/jxampl.bib /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bst /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bst/jabbrv.bst ... so I believe we can remove it. I guess we can remove jmpost but, for safety, please wait a while, I'll check it deliberately. Yoshino-san, if you are so kind to check these, please comment. > I will try my best to port it to libkpathsea6, but for now I gues > if nobody else takes this job, I guess we have to live with an uninstallable > texfam. I also tried to build texfam with libkpathsea6 but failed to do it. Tsuchiya-san, any comments? Best regards, 2012-4-27(Fri) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org