Hi guys,
Thanks for those logs, very helpful.
Would you be able to test the following patch on both systems and let
us know about the result?
Cheers,
Nestor
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
index 38b12e4..763e4d9 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_add_djhid_device(struct
dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev,
struct usb_device *usbdev = interface_to_usbdev(intf);
struct hid_device *dj_hiddev;
struct dj_device *dj_dev;
+ u32 reports_supported;
/* Device index goes from 1 to 6, we need 3 bytes to store the
* semicolon, the index, and a null terminator
@@ -264,9 +265,11 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_add_djhid_device(struct
dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev,
__func__);
goto dj_device_allocate_fail;
}
+ memcpy(&reports_supported,
+ &dj_report->report_params[DEVICE_PAIRED_RF_REPORT_TYPE],
+ sizeof(reports_supported));
- dj_dev->reports_supported = le32_to_cpu(
- dj_report->report_params[DEVICE_PAIRED_RF_REPORT_TYPE]);
+ dj_dev->reports_supported = le32_to_cpu(reports_supported);
dj_dev->hdev = dj_hiddev;
dj_dev->dj_receiver_dev = djrcv_dev;
dj_dev->device_index = dj_report->device_index;
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
>
> > Oh, it slipped my mind and I used the other (identical) mouse for this,
> > does that matter? They're the exact same model.
>
> Probably doesn't matter, but thanks for mentioning it.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
