Quoting Steve Langasek ([email protected]):
> reopen 609905
> tags 609905 - moreinfo unreproducible
> thanks
> 
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:37:01PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Last year, during my yearly samba bug triage, I asked whether this bug
> > was reproducible. As I didn't get any answer and am not myself in
> > position to reproduce it, I'm therefore closing it, as I'm doing with
> > "moreinfo, unreproducible" bugs instead of keeping them opened for
> > ages without any action.
> 
> Well, per my last mail to this bug, I don't think there's been a valid test
> of the reproducibility of this issue.  So as this bug should not be tagged
> 'moreinfo' or 'reproducible', it seems this does not meet your criteria, so
> I'm reopening. :)


I beg to disagree about "moreinfo". We're still waiting for
information from the original bug submitter and, guess what, I bet
than in 10 years, we still won't have any.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to