On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 19:01 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote: > Here is tetex-extra-apt.log > =========================== > Reading Package Lists... > Building Dependency Tree... > The following NEW packages will be installed: > tetex-extra > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B/10.5MB of archives. > After unpacking 40.1MB of additional disk space will be used. > Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra. > (Reading database ... 57352 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_2.0.2c-8_all.deb) ... > Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ... > > Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams with new version > > Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm with new version > > Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz with new version > > Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz with new version > Running initex. This may take some time. ... > Running updmap. This may take some time. ... > using config file /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg > using output directory /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config > > Scanning for LW35 support files > > Scanning for MixedMap entries: > > Scanning for Map entries: > > > Files generated in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config:
I don't know the postinst scripts of the teTeX 2 packages all that well, but I am wondering why there is no indication of update-updmap actually running. Although update-updmap must have run at some point, otherwise a manual updmap wouldn't have produced a correct map file. cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]