On 07.07.2012 00:13, Vugar Dzhamalov wrote: > > Thank you for coming back to me! I am absolutely committed! If you won't give > up on me than I am ready to do my best to help with it. Lets push it to the > very (happy) end :-)
Heh. Well, I ignored your bugreport for quite a while, and now, instead of being angry on me, you're in some rather.. different mood... That's nice :) > I believe that previously mentioned kernel failure warning was related to my > integrated NIC - Realtek 8111E and its drivers. Yes, kernel failure warning clearly relates to realtek nic, it has nothing really to do with kvm. There are very many variations of the hardware this driver supports, and some of them have, well, issues, and the driver slowly collects workarounds for various such issues. > I have been running my guest with e1000 since. Had no time to play with > virtio. > > So I'll give it a go this weekend. As soon as I get any results you'll be the > first to know. > > Do you think it could be somehow related to VDE switch? Should I try it on > the > Bridge interface? Yes, definitely. Note that VDE network backend in qemu isn't tested often, the main network config is with bridges, and it is much faster too, but ofcourse VDE has its usages (more in forensic environments). > Also I was wondering if I should give it a go with libvirt via virsh? Would > it > be useful somehow? It doesn't matter whenever you use libvirt or not. Libvirt will run the same kvm binary with similar command line. If you haven't used libvirt before, there's no need to learn it at this stage. > Anyways I'll try the same configuration first and will let you know. Thank you very much! /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
