On 8/14/12 10:03 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I see two options here: a) we update the existing package to the new amttool-tng tarball b) we package amttool-tng in addition to the existing amtterm package Option b) would allow users to choose between the two tools. However, according to its homepage, amttool-tng claims to be a continuation of amtterm. If that is true, I'd lean towards option a). What do you think?
Even though both amtterm and amttool are used for amt control, I think they are equally useful to warrant separate packages, or that the package name would be more generic (e.g. amt-tools). Maybe there are other amt tools that would be suitable for inclusion, for example to set up the IDE redirection. This is possible with the Intel AMT SDK, but it contains closed-source libraries.
For the mean time, I think option a) would be good and include both amtterm and amtterm-tng.
/Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
