On Monday 17 September 2012 08:41 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > The proposed NMU was based on the assumption that it would be easier to fix > the release critical bug first and > then advocate for other changes: >
Agreed. Just that the other bug, that the one in experimental fixes, is related to a kernel panic. It is still a minor bug though. > a) ask for an unblock of -10.1 fixing solely RC#687925 > b) discuss -11 while -10.1 migrates to testing > proceed as in b) to f) above. > Just in case we can push for both, well and good. Otherwise, advocate for this one. I am okay with either bug squashed. > I am concerned that including the publication of the resolution of RC#687925 > ( which blocks the installation > of the nova-volume package which is essential to the successfull deployment > of the entire OpenStack solution ) into a > larger discussion will involve a significant delay, maybe weeks, while the > other changes are debated. > > Thanks a lot for your work with the iscsitarget package : I use it daily :-) -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
