On 09/17/2012 07:41 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2012 10:28 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> On Monday 17 September 2012 08:41 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> The proposed NMU was based on the assumption that it would be easier to >>>> fix the release critical bug first and >>>> then advocate for other changes: >>>> >> Agreed. Just that the other bug, that the one in experimental fixes, is >> related to a kernel panic. It is still a minor bug though. >> > I also would have preferred to see this fix in the 1.4.20 stable branch > upstream. When I pulled in the bits yesterday, this fix was not in the > stable branch. Have you asked this upstream? > Hi,
I'm not familiar with the iscsitarget upstream. The patch comes from this upstream revision http://iscsitarget.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/iscsitarget?revision=478&view=revision and the rationale for applying it is described in detail in https://launchpad.net/bugs/967984 Does that answer your question ? Cheers
<<attachment: loic.vcf>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
