Hi, On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Matthias Klose wrote: > - the security team's implications about Oracle's binary releases, and > OpenJDK, which are just wrong. > > Andrew Haley made this clear in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/02/msg00005.html
I was under that false impression as well. But then to my surprise I noticed today that RHEL updated openjdk-6: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0246.html I would think this weighs in favour of keeping openjdk-6 in wheezy; users would be better served if patched releases can be made available, rather than if it is dropped and they are left with the last version that oldstable had. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
