On 05/07/2013 02:49 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Hello,

On 7 May 2013 14:31, VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS <eric2.vale...@orange.com> wrote:
As far as I know, I added information to an existing bug and did not create
a new one.
And a bit of testing before uploading wouldn't hurt anyway ;-)
The bug was already known, but it's a bit annoying to see bug reports
when the issue is already resolved.
When I added info at the issue it was still marked unresolved => I disagree

And yes 0.7.43 (not 0.9.43) resolves it allthough I think the "allow auto
multiple times" message in the chnagelog is a bit misleading as I have auto
only once!
Actually, no, it says exactly what was changed. As manual page says,
now the loopback is implicitly defined, and it's implicitly added to
the auto list, so one more auto keyword was adding it there again. I
don't know why was that made an error condition originally — it
shouldn't have been after all, but I have overlooked that when I was
preparing the upload.

Extract from the man page of interfaces:
    --------------
The file consists of zero or more "iface", "mapping", "auto", "allow-" and "source" stanzas. Here is an example.
       auto lo eth0
       allow-hotplug eth1

       iface lo inet loopback
   -------------------------

And the examples in /usr/share/doc should also be removed. BTW: if I do not add the auto lo line I get no lo interface at all even if I have the "iface lo inet loopback". So could you clarify via and example interface file for lo interface?

P.S. Please try to avoid sending HTML-only mails, especially to the bug tracker.

Welle well, If thunderbird was actually doing what I told him to do...

--
Eric Valette
Orange Lab Product and Services
Homebox Etudes Architecture et Développement
Architecte Livebox et Set Top Box
tél : (+33) 2 99 12 45 71
mél : <mailto:eric2.vale...@orange.com>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to