On 05/13/2013 10:49 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> The ftbfs bugs caused by vala and a new gobject-introspection can >> easily be >> fixed (at least in most cases) by switching to valac-0.20 which just >> got its way >> into unstable. I just fixed bug #707378 this way by switching the build >> dependency accordingly. > > BTW it's preferred to switch to 'valac (>= 0.20)' instead of > 'valac-0.20' if possible so that we can seamlessly switch the vala > interpreter in the future.
But valac in unstable is still 0.16, at least according to my rmadisson? Wouldn't this trigger FTBFS (until there is a proper valac) too? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
