On 05/13/2013 10:59 AM, Evgeni Golov wrote: > On 05/13/2013 10:49 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> The ftbfs bugs caused by vala and a new gobject-introspection can >>> easily be >>> fixed (at least in most cases) by switching to valac-0.20 which just >>> got its way >>> into unstable. I just fixed bug #707378 this way by switching the build >>> dependency accordingly. >> >> BTW it's preferred to switch to 'valac (>= 0.20)' instead of >> 'valac-0.20' if possible so that we can seamlessly switch the vala >> interpreter in the future. > > But valac in unstable is still 0.16, at least according to my rmadisson? > Wouldn't this trigger FTBFS (until there is a proper valac) too?
My bad. apt says there is 0.20. rmadisson seems broken then :/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
