Hi, On 2013-06-10 13:27:47 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Can you provide the access rights of .cups/lpoptions? > > $ ls -l ~/.cups/lpoptions
ypig:~> ls -l ~/.cups/lpoptions -rw-r--r-- 1 vlefevre vlefevre 74 2013-02-01 16:29:37 /home/vlefevre/.cups/lpoptions I've also done a strace diff between: (1) strace -o str1.out -f lpr lineskip.pdf (2) strace -o str2.out -f lpr -P lip-multi-3 lineskip.pdf in this order. I can notice in particular: [...] open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=117407552, ...}) = 0 mmap(NULL, 117407552, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = hex close(3) = 0 futex(hex, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 2147483647) = 0 geteuid() = 1000 getuid() = 1000 getegid() = 1000 getgid() = 1000 -access("lineskip.pdf", R_OK) = 0 -open("/home/vlefevre/.cups/lpoptions", O_RDONLY) = 3 -fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 -fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 -read(3, "Dest lip-multi-3 ColorModel=Gray"..., 4096) = 74 -close(3) = 0 open("/home/vlefevre/.cups/client.conf", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/cups/client.conf", O_RDONLY) = 3 fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 read(3, "#\n#\n# Sample client configurat"..., 4096) = 2224 read(3, "", 4096) = 0 close(3) = 0 open("/home/vlefevre/.cups/client.conf", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/cups/client.conf", O_RDONLY) = 3 fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 read(3, "#\n#\n# Sample client configurat"..., 4096) = 2224 read(3, "", 4096) = 0 close(3) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER, hex}, NULL, 8) = 0 access("/etc/gcrypt/fips_enabled", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 [...] -getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 4000}, ru_stime={0, 8000}, ...}) = 0 -times({tms_utime=0, tms_stime=0, tms_cutime=0, tms_cstime=0}) = 1718347093 -getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 4000}, ru_stime={0, 8000}, ...}) = 0 -times({tms_utime=0, tms_stime=0, tms_cutime=0, tms_cstime=0}) = 1718347093 -open("/etc/cups/lpoptions", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) -open("/home/vlefevre/.cups/lpoptions", O_RDONLY) = 5 -fcntl(5, F_GETFD) = 0 -fcntl(5, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 -read(5, "Dest lip-multi-3 ColorModel=Gray"..., 4096) = 74 +recvfrom(4, "[...]", 5, 0, NULL, NULL) = 5 +recvfrom(4, "[...]"..., 784, 0, NULL, NULL) = 784 +getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 0}, ru_stime={0, 12000}, ...}) = 0 +times({tms_utime=0, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=0, tms_cstime=0}) = 1718362144 +getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 0}, ru_stime={0, 12000}, ...}) = 0 +times({tms_utime=0, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=0, tms_cstime=0}) = 1718362144 +open("/dev/tty", O_RDONLY) = 5 +ioctl(5, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0 +ioctl(5, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0 +ioctl(5, SNDCTL_TMR_CONTINUE or TCSETSF, {B38400 opost -isig -icanon -echo ...}) = 0 +ioctl(5, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost -isig -icanon -echo ...}) = 0 +fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 9), ...}) = 0 +mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = hex +write(1, "Password for vlefevre on lip-pri"..., 60) = 60 [...] I won't send you the strace as it contains the password and maybe other private information, but /home/vlefevre/.cups/lpoptions is read twice (successfully) in case (1) and none in case (2). In case (1), the file was sent to lip-multi-1 instead of lipucb-mono-1. In case (2), the file was sent to lip-multi-3 as expected. > It's fine for you to disagree, but the list [0] is considered as > authoritative on bugs severities. If you think this list should be > changed, please start a discussion on a proper forum; probably a bug > on debian-policy as it's 1.1 chapter defines what bug corresponds to > a "serious" severity, which is completed by the Release Team's RC > policy [1]. Under the current rules, this bug doesn't fit the > defintion of serious in my reading. [1] also says: in the maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release (these issues are "serious" severity) You could also consider that due to security concerns, the package is unsuitable for release. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org