Hi again, Le lundi, 10 juin 2013 13.27:47, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > Under the current rules, this bug doesn't fit the defintion of serious in my > reading.
As you brought this bug to debian-devel@ [0], let me explain in little more details (which I thought were obvious) why I think this bug is neither a security or a serious problem: * it doesn't happen for everyone (it works as expected here); * not all printed documents carry sensitive information and failing to print to the correct printer is not a security problem in all cases. I never wrote that I wouldn't try to get this bug (which I agree it is) fixed, but just corrected the inflated bug severity. That useless debate on severities just distracted me from working on the bug itself. OdyX [0] http://lists.debian.org/%3c20130610111552.ga17...@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr%3E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
