Hi Thomas, Replies inline below.
Thomas Goirand schreef op za 22-06-2013 om 12:47 [+0800]: > This is done, 0.6 reached Sid. And I do appreciate that you sent such > a > report whenever a new version is out, so that I can do the packaging > work. Thanks! Thanks for the quick upload! I'll try to remember to do notifications whenever I release new versions. > One thing though. Could you stop tagging "happybase-0.6" and tag in a > normal way, simply "0.6"? Otherwise, I have to retag on our Git so I'm > not annoyed with git-buildpackage. You are using the Git tags to make Debian packages? That surprises me. Official HappyBase upstream tarball releases are made available from PyPI. Tarballs found there are the ones that should be (re)packaged by distributors, not "random" tags checked out version control systems. I'd urge you to package the officially released versions. The way I see it, the source tree as pointed to the Git tag is the *source* of a released version on PyPI. The exact packaging depends on various factors, such as build system versions. Btw, what you describe as "normal" tag names seems arbitrary. I have not encountered any widely accepted "standard" tagging workflows yet. Anyway, thanks for making HappyBase easily available for users. Please keep up the good work. :) — Wouter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part