On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 04:04:26PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 17:09:40 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > My understanding is that all the pieces are now in place for the archive to > > support :any dependencies on interpreter packages. > > No they're not, and this change seems to make anything python > unbuildable on the buildds. Please revert.
What specific buildd problems are you talking about? I'd be happy to look into them but will need details. (See also the britney patch I sent to -release today, which this change definitely triggers - but I don't see that as a reason to revert since we need to fix this anyway and it makes a good test case.) -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
