On Monday, September 16, 2013 15:21:05 Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 04:04:26PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 17:09:40 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > My understanding is that all the pieces are now in place for the archive > > > to > > > support :any dependencies on interpreter packages. > > > > No they're not, and this change seems to make anything python > > unbuildable on the buildds. Please revert. > > What specific buildd problems are you talking about? I'd be happy to > look into them but will need details. > > (See also the britney patch I sent to -release today, which this change > definitely triggers - but I don't see that as a reason to revert since > we need to fix this anyway and it makes a good test case.)
We already have a test case that isn't hurting anything (python3-defaults). The current dh-python in Unstable is now uninstallable, which makes it impossible to build any package using python3. Making dozens of packages unbuildable isn't a good way to have a test case. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
