Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> (2013-09-30): > > Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> (2013-06-10): > >> --- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-01-19 15:54:09.000000000 > >> +0100 > >> +++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-06-10 01:01:48.000000000 > >> +0200 > >> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ > >> +redmine (1.4.4+dfsg1-2+deb7u1) proposed-updates; urgency=low > > > > Even though that would work, I'd be happy to see "wheezy" in there, > > which can be useful after a while to figure out which suite was targeted > > at that point (without having to look at the version number, and its > > meaning). > > Do you mean it'd be better to use "wheezy-proposed-updates" as distribution ?
That or just "wheezy" :-) > > Assuming the latter change doesn't break the Ruby 1.8 use case (and > > doesn't need a dance similar to the respond_to one in the former), > > please upload (with or without an edit for the above mentioned point). > > I'm going to recheck that because i only remember doing it on irb, > not on redmine code. Thanks for that. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
