On 30/09/2013 11:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> (2013-09-30): >>> Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> (2013-06-10): >>>> --- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-01-19 15:54:09.000000000 >>>> +0100 >>>> +++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-06-10 01:01:48.000000000 >>>> +0200 >>>> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ >>>> +redmine (1.4.4+dfsg1-2+deb7u1) proposed-updates; urgency=low >>> >>> Even though that would work, I'd be happy to see "wheezy" in there, >>> which can be useful after a while to figure out which suite was targeted >>> at that point (without having to look at the version number, and its >>> meaning). >> >> Do you mean it'd be better to use "wheezy-proposed-updates" as distribution ? > > That or just "wheezy" :-) > >>> Assuming the latter change doesn't break the Ruby 1.8 use case (and >>> doesn't need a dance similar to the respond_to one in the former), >>> please upload (with or without an edit for the above mentioned point). >> >> I'm going to recheck that because i only remember doing it on irb, >> not on redmine code. > > Thanks for that.
There was a small error. Now both bugs i reproduced today are fixed. Uploading in a moment. Jérémy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
