On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Oliver Kiddle <okid...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > Debian does have ksh93u. Ambiguous > Latest version at the following URL is what > Debian has: > http://www2.research.att.com/~gsf/download/ This link shows 3 ksh93u versions > > I think there is a more recent version that is declared a beta or alpha. > > This said, I wouldn't be surprised if the download link is out-of-date > given that the maintainers are leaving AT&T. > > Oliver No the link are accurate, and as Olga said, what is beta is ksh98v The story goes like this Version JM 93u+ 2012-02-29 Is bugged (core dump on ##) Version AJM 93u+ 2012-06-28 Is correct (regarding ##) Version AJM 93u+ 2012-08-01 is correct *regarding ##) Debian binary ksh package for wheezy gets Version JM 93u+ 2012-02-29 and match the source code we got with apt-get source ksh Bottom line, you rigth, debian has the ksh93u+ but the only wrong one. Suse got a ksh93+ as well but a good one. I think wheezy deserve a clean ksh93, and should be patched, without waitng for next ksh93v Hope this helps Cheers, Phi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
