What is the way to replace the patched up 2012-02-29? Find sponsor,
declare him how bad it is?

Olga

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Oliver Kiddle <okid...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Phi Debian wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Oliver Kiddle <okid...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Debian does have ksh93u.
>>
>> Ambiguous
>
> Clearly we've got ambiguity in Debian versions of ksh too:
>
> wheezy does have 2012-02-29, testing/unstable have 2012-08-01. 2012-08-01 will
> never go into wheezy, the best we can do is patch (or wait for jessie to be
> stable). As Olga is taking over ksh, you'll have to persuade her to roll a
> 93u+-1.3 for wheezy.
>
> What apt-get source gives you depends on how your debian installation is
> configured.
>
> Frustratingly, I tried very hard to have 2012-08-01 pushed into wheezy during
> the freeze but the lack of a sponsor combined with strict application of 
> Debian
> policy meant that wheezy ended up with a patched up 2012-02-29.
>
> Oliver



-- 
      ,   _                                    _   ,
     { \/`o;====-    Olga Kryzhanovska   -====;o`\/ }
.----'-/`-/     olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com   \-`\-'----.
 `'-..-| /       http://twitter.com/fleyta     \ |-..-'`
      /\/\     Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer   /\/\
      `--`                                      `--`


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to