What is the way to replace the patched up 2012-02-29? Find sponsor, declare him how bad it is?
Olga On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Oliver Kiddle <okid...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Phi Debian wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Oliver Kiddle <okid...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > >> > Debian does have ksh93u. >> >> Ambiguous > > Clearly we've got ambiguity in Debian versions of ksh too: > > wheezy does have 2012-02-29, testing/unstable have 2012-08-01. 2012-08-01 will > never go into wheezy, the best we can do is patch (or wait for jessie to be > stable). As Olga is taking over ksh, you'll have to persuade her to roll a > 93u+-1.3 for wheezy. > > What apt-get source gives you depends on how your debian installation is > configured. > > Frustratingly, I tried very hard to have 2012-08-01 pushed into wheezy during > the freeze but the lack of a sponsor combined with strict application of > Debian > policy meant that wheezy ended up with a patched up 2012-02-29. > > Oliver -- , _ _ , { \/`o;====- Olga Kryzhanovska -====;o`\/ } .----'-/`-/ olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com \-`\-'----. `'-..-| / http://twitter.com/fleyta \ |-..-'` /\/\ Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer /\/\ `--` `--` -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org