On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:19:42 +0200 Gilles Crèvecœur wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:10:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Gilles, what's the output of "ruby -v" on your system? > > I use the ruby interpreter provide by official debian packages. > ruby -v output : ruby 1.9.3p448 (2013-06-27 revision 41675) [i486-linux]
OK, my question was primarily intended to check whether you were using Ruby 1.9, Ruby 1.8, or Ruby 2.0 as default interpreter. [...] > > Gilles, please provide the requested additional information, thanks. > > I apologize, I'm not comfortable at all with english, and this is the reason > why my message is so tight ;) No need to apologize, your English will improve as you practice it! Now, I have some tests I would like you to perform on your system, after (temporarily) re-upgrading to apt-listbugs version 0.1.10 or 0.1.11 You can issue all the following commands as regular user (no need to become root, in order to perform the tests). Test 0 ------ Is the output of the following commands identical to what I get or do they fail with errors? Please copy and paste the transcript of your shell session: $ apt-listbugs -v 0.1.11 $ LC_ALL=C apt-listbugs list apt/0.9.9 Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done serious bugs of apt (-> 0.9.9) <Resolved in some Version> #558784 - apt: re-adds removed keys (Fixed: 0.9.10) Summary: apt(1 bug) Test 1 ------ Does using Ruby 1.8 make any difference? In case you no longer have package ruby1.8 on your system, please temporarily re-install it. Please copy and paste the transcript of your shell session: $ LC_ALL=C ruby1.9.1 /usr/bin/apt-listbugs list apt/0.9.9 Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done serious bugs of apt (-> 0.9.9) <Resolved in some Version> #558784 - apt: re-adds removed keys (Fixed: 0.9.10) Summary: apt(1 bug) $ LC_ALL=C ruby1.8 /usr/bin/apt-listbugs list apt/0.9.9 Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done serious bugs of apt (-> 0.9.9) <Resolved in some Version> #558784 - apt: re-adds removed keys (Fixed: 0.9.10) Summary: apt(1 bug) Test 2 ------ Please try and run the interactive Ruby interpreter. Type one command at a time and see the result. Please copy and paste the transcript of your irb session: $ LC_ALL=C irb1.9.1 irb(main):001:0> require 'soap/rpc/driver' => true irb(main):002:0> server="http://bugs.debian.org:80/cgi-bin/soap.cgi"; => "http://bugs.debian.org:80/cgi-bin/soap.cgi"; irb(main):003:0> ns = 'Debbugs/SOAP/' => "Debbugs/SOAP/" irb(main):004:0> drv = SOAP::RPC::Driver.new(server, ns) => #<SOAP::RPC::Driver:#<SOAP::RPC::Proxy:http://bugs.debian.org:80/cgi-bin/soap.cgi>> irb(main):005:0> drv.add_method('get_bugs','keyparam') => #<Method: #<SOAP::RPC::Driver:#<SOAP::RPC::Proxy:http://bugs.debian.org:80/cgi-bin/soap.cgi>>.get_bugs> irb(main):006:0> drv.get_bugs(['package', 'apt-listbugs', 'severity', 'normal']).sort => [493632, 499657, 536613, 688506, 693291, 725479, 725672] irb(main):007:0> exit Please let me know, thanks for your feedback! -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp5rn6Ax7cPB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
