Let's recap: SDL_FORCE_SOUNDFONTS=1 ./playmus /usr/share/games/dink/dink/Sound/104.mid SDL_FORCE_SOUNDFONTS=1 ./playmus /tmp/midibug/sound/10.mid
Results: upstream 1.2.12 + bare ./configure - 104.mid: OK - minibug: OK upstream 1.2.12 + bare ./configure + bug-694260-freedink_stack_corruption.patch: - 104.mid: faster tempo - minibug: slower tempo debian 1.2.12-9 w/ all patches: - 104.mid: faster tempo - minibug: still crashes! #694260 ain't fixed! debian 1.2.12-9 w/o any patch: - 104.mid: OK - minibug: still crashes! debian 1.2.12-9 w/o any patch w/o -fstatck-protector: - 104.mid: OK - minibug: OK > - Does "current debian - all patches" mean "minus all patches, that > is, no patches applied", or "current debian, with all patches > applied"? minus all patches > - "current debian" means as the binary package, "all patches > included", or "current version of the code as shipped in .orig.tar, > but no patches"? current version witch all patches > - and more importantly, upstream is the same version as Debian's > .orig.tar, that is 1.2.12, or the HEAD, or something else? 1.2.12 from http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release-1.2.html > Upstream created the patch later than 1.2.12 and I think that it's > carried in 2.0.0, so it's important to ask the patch to be reverted if > it's wrong. Indeed. It may be worth checking whether the patch is meant for SDL_Mixer or SDL*2*_Mixer. Cheers! Sylvain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
