May I suggest that we promote the rcs dependency to a "Recommends" and forward the rest (menus grayed out, informative message, etc) upstream? -- =Do- N.AND
2013/11/21 Per Olofsson <pe...@debian.org>: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 15:41 +0100, Martin Haase wrote: >> Package: lyx >> Version: 2.0.6-1+b1 >> Severity: normal >> >> When i tried to register a document for vcs, lyx was unable to find >> the command 'ci'. It took me a while to find out that 'ci' is part of >> the rcs package. hence the lyx package should be made dependent on >> rcs, so that rcs will be installed automagically with lyx. Only >> suggesting it is imho not strong enough. > > There are a lot of features in lyx which require different > packages. Not everyone uses the rcs integration. It certainly > shouldn't be a dependency. > > I suppose it could be a Recommends though, then it would be installed > automatically (unless disabled by the user). It really depends on how > popular it is. > > At the very least, the error message should mention that "ci" is > provided by the rcs package. > > -- > Pelle > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-lyx-devel mailing list > pkg-lyx-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org