"R.Ramkumar" <r...@cse.iitm.ernet.in> writes:

> One of the problems I have faced with the debian startup procedure
> is that, while the run-parts like technique offers a lot of
> flexibility, loading a lot of very small source files makes the
> startup quite slow. Here's a implementation of debian-startup.el
> which handles this by dynamically creating and byte-compiling a
> "cache" of all the startup bits on a per-user basis, taking care of
> all the dependencies which could possibly invalidate the cache. The
> package also features a few other enhancements (might be
> controversial, I leave it to you to figure out if it is worthwhile
> including these changes :) ). Please see the commentary section for
> a description of all the changes.

So, apologies for not responding long ago, but I wondered if you thought
this was still an issue, and if so, if you had run any benchmarks that
demonstrate the difference.

Speaking fairly generally, unless the difference is substantial, and
applies broadly, I'll be a bit hesitant to add the additional
complexity.

Thanks for the help
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to