On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 00:18 +0100, William Boughton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:40:42PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 19:03 +0100, William Boughton wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > In order to support partial upgrades and going back to an old kernel
> > this needs to be made conditional, ideally using the same infrastructure
> > I proposed in the patch I sent to #731345 last night (message id
> > <1389216502.7769.40.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk>).
> > 
> > After applying that patch changing your "DTB-Append: yes" to
> > "DTB-Append-From: 3.12" should be sufficient. If you could try that in
> > some of the scenarios I mention in that mail then I would be most
> > grateful.
> 
> Okay tried some variations, and it seems to work.
> Including no DTB appended on 3.11 where it isn't needed,
> reinstalling 3.12, after a purge not tested with 3.13
> there is no build yet for kirkwood.

This all sounds good, thanks for testing.

Rather than duplicate the stanzas I've tries making flash-kernel accept
multiple Machine: fields in a stanza. Which appears to be working OK.

I'll clean up what I've got and push it shortly.

> > If that is the case then I think DTB-Append-From: 3.12 is the right
> > choice.
> 
> Yeah i noticed this DTB stuff when 3.12 broke 3.11 in jessie worked fine 
> using board support.

OK 3.12 it is, thanks.

> > > I don't know if there are other models of guruplug, there only seems
> > > to be a single guruplug dtb.
> 
> > This is something which will need to be solved for other platforms, I've
> > got some vague ideas how to do it, but hopefully the guruplug won't be
> > affected.
> 
> Yeah i also have a dreamplug, which appears to be already supported
> in theory :), but in practice will probably also want a DTB-Append-From: 

Dreamplug has always been DTB based (it was one of the first kirkwood
dtb platforms), and there was never a boardfile version actually in
upstream IIRC (although I think early patches were boardfile based). So
"DTB-Append: yes" is fine in that case. I've had a couple running since
Wheezy a while now (although one appears to have just eaten its
mmc :-( )

Ian.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to