On Friday, January 31, 2014 15:21:53 Robert Edmonds wrote: > Chris Knadle wrote: > > severity 737246 grave > > thanks > > > > > It's probably related to #736801 I guess. > > > > Unfortunately this is not related to #736801 as best I can tell; > > recompiling mumble locally with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-7 has the same result. > > This means mumble is currently borked. :-( > > > > -- Chris > > In that case, it looks like my changes in 2.5.0-6 / -7 are just broken. > Most likely we need to revert back to the approach in 2.5.0-5 but fix > the atomic code so that it works on the architectures with older default > gcc versions. I'll see if I can get that done in the next day or so.
I'll have a look at the protobuf snapshots at snapshot.debian.org to see if I can understand what's going on. Maybe as a first check I'll build mumble 1.2.4-0.1 against protobuf 2.5.0-5 for sid/amd64 to see that the result works. Thanks much. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
