On Friday, January 31, 2014 23:41:01 Chris Knadle wrote: > On Friday, January 31, 2014 15:21:53 Robert Edmonds wrote: > > Chris Knadle wrote: > > > severity 737246 grave > > > thanks > > > > > > > It's probably related to #736801 I guess. > > > > > > Unfortunately this is not related to #736801 as best I can tell; > > > recompiling mumble locally with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-7 has the same > > > result. > > > > > > This means mumble is currently borked. :-( > > > > > > -- Chris > > > > In that case, it looks like my changes in 2.5.0-6 / -7 are just broken. > > Yes -3 and -5 work, -6 / -7 do not.
Correction: mumble will work when built against protobuf 2.5.0-7 ; someone reported this to me and it took me a while but I was able to verify it -- apparently I had some complications with cowbuilder I didn't know I had. My apologies for being in error on this. Is there a way to get Debian's buildd's to rebuild the package? BTW I believe this is a situation where the ABI changed between protobuf 2.5.0-5 and -7 but the name (i.e. the number in the name) of the library should have changed to trigger the Debian buildd's to rebuild the package. At least that's the way I interpret the text in Debian Policy section 8.1. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html Thanks. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
