On 24.05.14 23:38:38, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Dariusz Dwornikowski <dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl>, 2014-05-21, > 13:48: > >>If you listed files to remove in debian/clean, you could avoid the > >>override in debian/rules. > >Yes, fixed that too. Settled for d/rules. > > Well, now I can't build the source package: > > rm -f *.o > rm -f pddet > rm debian/upstream > rm: cannot remove ‘debian/upstream’: No such file or directory > debian/rules:13: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_clean' failed
I forgot to push sorry, now it will build. > > > What happened to debian/patch/legacy.patch? > > Upstream writes: > > 2.7 4-APR-2014 __APPLE__ port, fix linux 64 bit port. > > I wonder how badly broken is the package in the archive (2.4). My > understanding is that it's completely useless on some architectures, because > it doesn't actually stress-test anything; but I might be wrong. > As upstream informed me legacy.patch is in 2.7 already, which I try to push into Debian, that is why I have deleted it. -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org