Hi Vincent, On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 08:02:56AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 16 avril 2014 06:15 +0900, Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shi...@gnu.org> : > > > There will be no response, even if you are waiting. Instead, how about > > making a new package named 'global6'? Such cases are often seen. > > e.g. > > Python: python, python3 > > gnupg: gnupg, gnupg2 > > > > Since the present package includes Ron's fine htmake, it should be > > considered a special one. So, the new package may co-exist with it. > > There is no fear of collisions, because Ron's package is 'global5' > > forever. :) > > Unfortunately, because of the conflicting names, it would be > problematic. Ron, will you agree if someone packaged global6 without the > CGI stuff and use of the alternative system to let people choose between > global and global6 for gtags and other commands?
That sounds a lot like taking a horrible mess, and making it even more horrible and messy to me ... which seems like quite step in the wrong direction. > I am using gg-tags in Emacs and the current version of global in Debian > just doesn't work with this mode. What changed incompatibly to make it not work? And what would need patching to fix that? I'd really much rather see problems get fixed than layered under even more problems. If someone familiar with Emacs has some details of what doesn't work, and what needs to be done so that it will, that sounds like a separate bug to be addressed to me. Cheers, Ron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
