On 20/06/14 10:44, Marco d'Itri wrote: > No, he is right: if the message is not modified then the DKIM signature > will be valid. This is one of the solutions implemented by mailman.
If it is viable and not too difficult to do this, then I'd ask the listmasters to please consider it as a last resort to excluding users of p=reject domains. Fortunately the main lists.d.o do not rewrite the subject, which would have been the most inconvenient change to make. Still awkward for the BTS and alioth lists. I guess some of the added list headers might need to be moved to precede instead of follow existing headers? The footer is something I could personally live without. The rare message doesn't include the footer anyway (HTML?), so I'm used to getting its Message-ID from the headers. The unsubscribe instructions in the footer are still not always followed. And doesn't the footer already negatively affect PGP/MIME or inline PGP signatures? I think it causes signed mails to become only 'partially signed'? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
