> Scribit Steve Langasek dies 26/11/2005 hora 03:47: > > No, because this data *is* both shareable and read-only; it is written > > to only by certain admin operations. > > I don't see how you can still consider data that is sometimes modified > by priviledged users read-only... Data only modified by the core system, > including dpkg, should be considered read-only when no user, including > priviledged ones, modifies it. >
The policy states (9.1.1): "The location of all installed files and directories must comply with the File system Hierarchy Standard (FHS), version 2.1" ... Are the files created by fai-setup/make-fai-nfsroot really to be considered "installed files", or does the policy rather talk about files installed by dpkg? Even though I'd also prefer to have them in /srv (and I do have them there on my hosts), I don't think that the severity was justified; we will consider your report for the next releases anyway, but keeping a release that does not yet fix that bug from entering testing won't help anyone much... Best regards, Michael
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
