Quoting Adam D. Barratt (2014-09-05 13:22:06) > Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > > On 2014-09-05 11:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Seems from <https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ghostscript> >> and >> <https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghostscript> >> that binary package ghostscript-cups needs to explicitly be removed >> from testing to allow new release (which has that package dropped) is >> allowed to migrate to testing. > > No, it needs to be removed _from unstable_. Binary packages are not > individually removed from testing other than as part of an automatic > migration. (and in any case removal from testing wouldn't help, as the > outdated packages would still be _in unstable_.) > >> ...and reportbug tells me you are the ones to task to about that. > > If your choice of suite were correct, sure. :-) As it's not, it's not. > > I'm re-assigning this to ftp.d.o rather than closing it, but to save > people checking, the reason that the package isn't getting > semi-autoremoved by the FTP team is: > > dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by ghostscript)" -s > unstable -a > amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc > > -p -R -b ghostscript-cups > - broken Depends: > splix: printer-driver-splix
Thanks for the explanation. I will file a severe bugreport against printer-driver-splix. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
