Quoting Adam D. Barratt (2014-09-05 14:23:08) > On 2014-09-05 13:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> the package ghostscript-cups should be dropped, but a non-versioned >> dependency against it is fine as that is satisfied by cups-filters >> now providing that package. > > dak's removal tool doesn't always cope with cases such as this. > >> So tell me again: Which package needs removal in unstable for >> ghostscript to be allowed into testing?!? > > The answer's still the same - the ghostscript-cups binary needs to be > removed, because it's no longer built from the ghostscript source. Now > that the details have been explained, someone from the FTP team will > hopefully pick this up and everything will be fine. :)
Thanks, again :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
