On 27.09.2014 01:26, Martin Quinson wrote: [...] >> Should be removed, yes, but 0.19 spent a few months in the NEW queue >> and I didn't get around to it yet. Thanks for the heads-up. >> >> Martin, what do you think of adding 'provides', something like >> flare-game provides flare and flare-data? I don't know if there's a >> downside to that, I don't have much experience in that area. Once >> this is done, I can remove the others. >> >> Alternatively, I was thinking on making the 0.18 versions to be just >> meta-packages (flare -> flare-engine, flare-date -> flare-game). >> >> Looking forward to read your opinions on the matter.
I think flare and flare-data should depend on flare-engine and flare-game respectively. It would definitely ensure that users pulled in the new version during an upgrade. That is basically method 2 which is described here: https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package Cheers, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
