2014-09-27 12:28 GMT+01:00 Markus Koschany <a...@gambaru.de>: > On 27.09.2014 01:26, Martin Quinson wrote: > [...] >>> Should be removed, yes, but 0.19 spent a few months in the NEW queue >>> and I didn't get around to it yet. Thanks for the heads-up. >>> >>> Martin, what do you think of adding 'provides', something like >>> flare-game provides flare and flare-data? I don't know if there's a >>> downside to that, I don't have much experience in that area. Once >>> this is done, I can remove the others. >>> >>> Alternatively, I was thinking on making the 0.18 versions to be just >>> meta-packages (flare -> flare-engine, flare-date -> flare-game). >>> >>> Looking forward to read your opinions on the matter. > > I think flare and flare-data should depend on flare-engine and > flare-game respectively. It would definitely ensure that users pulled in > the new version during an upgrade. > > That is basically method 2 which is described here: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
I implemented the aforementioned changes (current src:flare bumping to 0.19 and with binary metapackages pulling -engine and -game). Hope that everything is fine now. Cheers and thanks. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
