2014-10-06 11:46 GMT+02:00 Agustin Martin <agmar...@debian.org>:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:35:35PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> where aspell-autobuildhash is established as the preferred method for
> packaging aspell dictionaries, but not made mandatory.
>
>> That sounds like an RC bug in aspell, missing Breaks/Conflicts against
>> packages it breaks?  Unless I'm misunderstanding something.
>
> Right, thanks. Just filed
>
> [#764189: Must break old pre-multiarch arch:any aspell dictionaries]
>
> Will care of this ASAP with a 0-day NMU.

Hi again,

Noticed that my wording above might be confusing. The 0-day NMU refers
to aspell, not norwegian, I did not intend to NMU norwegian.

On the other hand, aspell is waiting for fixed aspell-da and aspell-no
to reach testing. I started co-maintaining aspell-da and a new upload
also including new upstream release is waiting to reach testing. That
leaves aspell-no as the only pending issue. Let me know if you prefer
me to request a binary NMU.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to