On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 09:24:11AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 06:14:40PM +0100, Moritz Strohm wrote: > > Package: iceweasel > > Version: 24.4.0esr-1~deb7u2 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hello > > > > > > I have just updated my Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy armhf system via > > update-notifier > > and did a "non safe update" (does also remove pacakges). Xulrunner was > > updated > > to version 24.8.1esr-2~deb7u1 and the iceweasel package was removed. I > > tried to > > reinstall iceweasel > > which was unsuccessful. > > > > Iceweasel demands xulrunner version 24.8.1esr-1~deb7u1 but version > > 24.8.1esr-2~deb7u1 was installed. > > > > After that I removed xulrunner and retried to install iceweasel but the same > > dependency problem appeared. > > > > I disabled the mozilla.debian.net repository, did apt-get update and tried > > to > > install iceweasel once more > > but it failed again because of the wrong version of xulrunner. > > > > Bug #695212 may be related to my dependency problem with iceweasel. > > > > Possible solutions: > > - iceweasel and xulrunner should be updated at the same time > > - the dependency on xulrunner should not include checking for minor version > > numbers (e.g. xulruner >24.8.x.x). > > The problem is that the last iceweasel package for stable is not > available on armhf somehow.
According to buildd.debian.org, the package was built on armhf: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=iceweasel&suite=wheezy However, it indeed did not show up in the repository: $ rmadison iceweasel | grep wheezy-security iceweasel | 17.0.10esr-1~deb7u1 | wheezy-security | source, ia64, mips, mipsel iceweasel | 24.5.0esr-1~deb7u1 | wheezy-security | source, sparc iceweasel | 24.8.1esr-1~deb7u1 | wheezy-security | source, armhf, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, s390 iceweasel | 31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1 | wheezy-security | source, amd64, armel, i386, powerpc, s390x kfreebsd-* and s390 seem to be in the same situation. ia64, sparc and mips* are even worse. Dear FTP masters/buildd maintainers, would you have any idea on what is going on? -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature