On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:35:33AM +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Josue Ortega > <josueort...@debian.org.gt> wrote: > > Package: libzmq1 > > Version: 2.2.0+dfsg-6 > > > > I've found this package is 2 versions behind of the latesst upstream > > version. > > Is there any reason to keep the version 2.2.0 in the archive? > As I know there's no lagging behind upstream, it's the latest v2 > release[1]. Please tell me if you know otherwise. > Yes, it's needed as amavisd-new depends on libzeromq-perl which in > turns depends on libzmq1 . > > > Also I've found the watch file has the version 2 hardcoded. I am attaching a > > patch to fix the watch file. > It hardcodes 2 as it's the v2 release. Your patch just create confusion. > > Regards, > Laszlo/GCS > [1] https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq2-x/releases
Hi Laszlo, Based on the zeromq download page[1] the actual stable release is 4.0.5, that's the reason I've made the watch patch. Reviewing the github link you brought and comparing it with the [2] NEWS file seems to me that it's the newer version of the same library. Is the v4 different of v2? if this is true, I am willing to help to package the v4. But to me it seems it's just a newer version of the current lib that is in the archive. Let me know if I am missing something between the two versions. IMO If v2 and v4 are different and have different purposes it would be great specify the version in the package description because right now is confusing. Cheers [1]: http://zeromq.org/intro:get-the-software [2]: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/blob/master/NEWS --- Josue Ortega «Happy Hacking» http://josueortega.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
