On 17/01/15 22:02, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 12 janvier 2015 16:59 +0100, Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> : > > >>> I have not tested the result, but the package looks good otherwise. > >> > >> I've just reuploaded the package to mentors. It should be visible in > >> few minutes. > > > > I'll try the package later. > > I am fine with the package as is. What do you think about what I said > about debian/copyright and the MIT/Expat license? > -- > Debian package sponsoring guidelines: > http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
Hi Vincent, my only concern is that the text of the license is not literally the MIT/Expat license so I would prefer to call it differently. See (https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-specification): "These short names have the specified meanings across all uses of this file format, and must not be used to refer to any other licenses. Parsers may thus rely on these short names referring to the same licenses wherever they occur, without needing to parse or compare the full license text. Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
