On 17/01/15 22:33, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 17 janvier 2015 22:17 +0100, Tomasz Buchert <tomasz.buch...@inria.fr> : > > >> I am fine with the package as is. What do you think about what I said > >> about debian/copyright and the MIT/Expat license? > > > my only concern is that the text of the license is not > > literally the MIT/Expat license so I would prefer to call > > it differently. See > > (https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-specification): > > > > "These short names have the specified meanings across all uses of this > > file format, and must not be used to refer to any other > > licenses. Parsers may thus rely on these short names referring to the > > same licenses wherever they occur, without needing to parse or compare > > the full license text. > > OK, I don't mind. We'll see what FTP masters will say about that. The > package is ready to upload, should I? > -- > Debian package sponsoring guidelines: > http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
I believe so :). Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
