Package: libpango1.0-dev
Version: 1.36.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #683592

pango1.0 (1.36.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Drop Multi-Arch: same for libpango1.0-dev. The libpango1.0-dev package
    ships architecture specific binaries in /usr/bin. While those binaries
    could eventually be split off into a separate binary package, we just
    revert the change for now and defer it until there is actual need for it.

What the heck is that iomment about 'defer until there is actual need for it'?
There is need for it. Why else would this bug have been filed?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libpango1.0-dev depends on:
ii  gir1.2-pango-1.0     1.36.8-3
ii  libc6                2.19-13
ii  libcairo2            1.14.0-2.1
ii  libcairo2-dev        1.14.0-2.1
ii  libfontconfig1       2.11.0-6.3
ii  libfontconfig1-dev   2.11.0-6.3
ii  libfreetype6         2.5.2-2
ii  libfreetype6-dev     2.5.2-2
ii  libglib2.0-0         2.42.1-1
ii  libglib2.0-dev       2.42.1-1
ii  libharfbuzz-dev      0.9.35-2
ii  libpango-1.0-0       1.36.8-3
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.36.8-3
ii  libpangoft2-1.0-0    1.36.8-3
ii  libpangoxft-1.0-0    1.36.8-3
ii  libx11-6             2:1.6.2-3
ii  libx11-dev           2:1.6.2-3
ii  libxft-dev           2.3.2-1
ii  libxft2              2.3.2-1
ii  libxrender-dev       1:0.9.8-1+b1
ii  libxrender1          1:0.9.8-1+b1
ii  pkg-config           0.28-1

Versions of packages libpango1.0-dev recommends:
ii  debhelper  9.20141022

Versions of packages libpango1.0-dev suggests:
ii  imagemagick      8:6.8.9.9-5
ii  libpango1.0-doc  1.36.8-3

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to