On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 21:25 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:21:05AM +0000, olivier sallou > <olivier.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > X-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org > > > > Please unblock package logol > > > > I have to admit that I have troubles to take a decision for this case. > If we are going to remove gridengine, then I'd remove logol as well > because:
I'm confused. My understanding from the thread ending at https://lists.debian.org/950673988.3780910.1423380824041.javamail.zim...@irisa.fr was that we were keeping the drmaa package. [...] > Also, I wonder if it is a good time to remove gridengine at all. It is > not like it needed many updates in stable or oldstable to worry about it. > My preference would be to keep gridengine and not bother ourselves. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gridengine-devel/2014-October/000737.html says "It should be removed in its current state, particularly as the configuration is totally insecure and doesn't ship the components to secure it" and the package has been RFH for nearly two years. Given that and the discussion in #776131, I'm not sure keeping the package in its current state is the best idea. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
