Le Wed Feb 18 2015 at 9:25:56 PM, Mehdi Dogguy <me...@dogguy.org> a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:21:05AM +0000, olivier sallou < > olivier.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > X-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org > > > > Please unblock package logol > > > > I have to admit that I have troubles to take a decision for this case. > If we are going to remove gridengine, then I'd remove logol as well > because: > a) I don't know if releasing w/o DRMAA support in logol makes much sense. > Does it? > Yes it does. Logol works in local mode or drmaa mode. Here we just remove the drmaa mode. b) It was not part of past stable releases. > As it did not exist before, it could not be in previous stable releases.... c) I am not comfortable with the introduced changes to remove DRMAA support. > I am the author of the software, so I can tell you changes are fine. We just remove the drmaa support option. > > Also, I wonder if it is a good time to remove gridengine at all. It is > not like it needed many updates in stable or oldstable to worry about it. > My preference would be to keep gridengine and not bother ourselves. > Keeping gridengine would be fine for me ;-) But the bug causing the gridengine removal (and consequently logol) contains quite a lot of discussions already. It seems that current release contains security issues and maintenance issues. Olivier > > Any other opinions from the team? > > Regards, > > -- > Mehdi Dogguy >
