Hi Steve,

I've seen that slowdown myself on big mails. This problem doesn't stem 
from a mail though as the last command sent to the server is SELECT.

Cheers,

-- 
Sammy Spets
Synerger Pty Ltd
http://www.synerger.com/

On 10-Feb-05 15:57, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:30:37AM +1100, Sammy Spets wrote:
> >Hi John,
> >
> >Thanks for the swift response.
> >
> >On 10-Feb-05 08:23, John Goerzen wrote:
> >> And here we see that no reply was ever received.  I'd try running
> >> OfflineIMAP with -1 to start with.  If that works, try increasing
> >> concurrency by 1 each time and see if you can find a point where it
> >> stops working.  Once you do, you can grab a debug log with -d imap.
> >> Maybe there is something weird going on.
> >
> >I ran strace using -1 previously. I ran 'offlineimap -1 -d imap' and it
> >freezes here:
> >
> >Syncing Underwater.Announcements: IMAP -> Maildir
> >DEBUG[imap]:   56:14.47 > BKPF44 SELECT Underwater.Announcements
> >
> >The full imap debug output is available at www.synerger.com/oimap.debug
> >
> >Server is dovecot. Is there another way I can slow down offlineimap so I 
> >can test whether dovecot is dying under the barrage of commands?
> >
> >Oh! Another user of the same server that uses offlineimap does not have
> >any troubles with it.
> 
> What I see occasionally with dovecot and offlineimap is a significant
> slowdown on large individual pieces of mail. If I leave things running
> for a few minutes it will recover and continue eventually. Can you get
> debug from the server to see how big that particular mail is?
> 
> -- 
> Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/



Reply via email to