On 29/03/15 at 22:08 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 29/03/15 at 19:43 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >> I think DSA position is rasonable, yet UDD data is really valuable not > >> only for debian-related projects (jenkins in the above quote) but for > >> people who want to do random stuff with debian's data for whatever > >> reason. IMHO providing a means for that people to access the data is > >> really nice (not just the db dump; not everybody is able to setup > >> postgres). > > > > Note that another way to fix that specific problem would be to move > > jenkins to a DSA-managed machine. > > INPROGRESS > (debian time) > > >> > 5) Couldn't you trigger the dumps from your side, by calling pg_dump > >> > inside an SSH connection to ullmann.d.o? > >> > >> Given that I'm no DD I can't, yet paulproteus maybe can set it up. > >> Yet, I'd prefer to download standard dumps from udd.d.o. > > > > Would there be a way to make the unofficial UDD mirror slightly more > > official? Who has admin access to it currently? Only Asheesh? > > also me. > > What do you mean with with "slightly more official"? putting it under > a .debian.net domain?
Well maintained by more than one person is already something :-) A .d.n domain name would be nice, unless the hoster insists on advertising that way. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
