Hi,

Roland Hieber wrote:
> I guess this bug is no longer applicable, conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1
> currently does depend on xulrunner-2.0 (besides others),

IIRC that was not the point of the bug report.

It was about which xulrunner version is the _first_ (or even worse,
the sole) alternative and I refused (and still refuse) to use a
specific version just because some downstream distribution has a
specific preference.

> and by the way, xulrunner-2.0 is no longer present in the archive
> [1].

Yeah, but the conkeror package is not only installable on Debian or
supported Debian releases. So unless there are signs that it doesn't
work anymore with some specific xulrunner version, I intend keep these
alternative dependencies.

>From my point of view, this is a bug report which I've never fix and
hence never close. Which is also the reason why I tagged it wontfix.

                Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to